Greenhouse project consulting, engineering and supply coordination worldwide
projects@aegisgreenhouse.com
Project portfolio
Every project below records the same information: what the client needed commercially, which site constraints ruled options out, what Aegis specified, which technology was selected and what changed as a result. Use them to compare engineering decisions against your own project.
Case studies
Filter by what matters to your own project: climate, crop, greenhouse type and scale.
Kazakhstan · Central Asia
High-wire tomato production planned for a continental climate with heavy snow load, long heating season and a year-round supply contract to meet.
United Arab Emirates · Middle East
Year-round leafy green supply in a desert climate, where cooling capacity and water efficiency determined the entire design.
Mexico · North America
A phased export development where the priority was staging capital across three blocks without rebuilding shared infrastructure at each stage.
Saudi Arabia · Middle East
A premium fruit project where fruit quality and harvest ergonomics mattered more than raw production volume.
Peru · South America
An export project where protection was used to shift harvest into a higher-price window rather than simply to raise yield.
01
Each case study follows the same structure so you can compare decisions rather than marketing claims.
Every greenhouse project starts from a commercial objective, not a product. A retail supply contract, an export price window and a premium fresh segment each lead to a different structure, different climate equipment and a different capital budget — even for the same crop. Each case study therefore opens with the customer objective and the site constraints before any technology is mentioned.
The challenge section lists the constraints that ruled options out. These are the details that decide a specification: design snow load, summer wet-bulb temperature, feed water sodium, heating season length, pest pressure from neighbouring farms. When a greenhouse underperforms, it is almost always because one of these was not checked before the structure was ordered.
The technology selection table then records what was chosen and why. Reading the reason column across several projects is the fastest way to understand why two greenhouses that look similar can differ by a factor of five in capital cost per square metre.
02
The same evidence set is produced for each project so the investor can audit decisions after handover.
FAQ
Direct answers to the questions investors and growers ask most often.
Aegis is an independent greenhouse solution provider, not a manufacturer. On each project we prepared the technical specification, ran supplier selection, normalised quotations and coordinated engineering, logistics and installation supervision on the client’s behalf. Structures and equipment were supplied by selected specialist manufacturers.
Our project experience spans roughly 5,000 m² to more than 80,000 m². Below about 5,000 m² the engineering coordination effort is usually hard to justify commercially, and above 10 ha we plan the development in phases with shared infrastructure sized for the final area.
Yes. Tell us your country, target crop and planned growing area and we will point you to the closest comparable project experience, including the climate constraints and the specification decisions that mattered most.
For a typical single-phase project, allow roughly two to four months for feasibility and specification, two to four months for supply and shipping, and two to five months for installation and commissioning, depending on greenhouse type, area and site access.
Continue
Explore the connected technical and commercial topics for this project stage.
Send your location, target crop and planned growing area. You will receive a technical response with a suitable greenhouse configuration and an indicative budget range.
Independent greenhouse solution provider · Response within one business day