Outcome
The revised specification cost more per square metre than the original quotation but changed the economics of the project.
- Built area
- 30,000 m²
- Quotations normalised
- 5 suppliers
- Modelled energy saving
- Approx. 25% vs single screen
- Scope gaps found
- 11 exclusions
Eleven scope exclusions were identified in the original supplier quotations before contract, including the internal screen drive system and the fertigation drain recovery — items that would otherwise have become variation orders after mobilisation.
The double screen and insulated perimeter raised structural capital cost but reduced modelled winter heating demand by roughly a quarter, shortening the payback on the additional investment to under three heating seasons.
Because one unified scope of work was issued, the investor was able to compare supplier pricing on equivalent terms for the first time in the project.