Before comparing screen offers, define the operating conditions and package boundaries that make the offers comparable. This page prepares a supplier-comparable brief for a 20,000-30,000 m2 Gothic multi-span reference facility, where a woven energy screen, rail layout, drive arrangement, control interface and acceptance evidence must be evaluated as one scope rather than as fabric alone.
Confidential reference-scenario note: This is a confidential planning scenario, not a named client project or verified Aegis delivery. The Central Anatolian plateau context, 900-1,200 m elevation, -15 C winter baseline, high-wire tomato programme, USD 18-35/m2 screen-package allowance and performance comparisons are conservative assumptions used for specification discussion and supplier quotation preparation.
- Decision to make: define a greenhouse energy screen selection brief that allows suppliers to price the same performance and interface requirements.
- Aegis role: consulting, planning, technology-selection support, supplier coordination and project-management assistance for a screen package integrated with a Gothic multi-span structure and Priva or HortiMaX controls.
- RFQ boundary: assign fabric, rails, drives, truss attachments, 24 V or 400 V electrical interfaces, controls programming, commissioning and spares before award.
- Acceptance basis: require documented response at 0%, 50% and 100% screen positions, including position feedback within 5% tolerance, alarms and manual override.
Why this reference scenario answers a different procurement question
Generic technology comparisons can explain what an energy screen does; this commercial greenhouse energy screen specification framework addresses what must be owned, excluded and tested before quotations can be normalized. It focuses on RFQ-ready responsibilities for a 4.5 m bay, 5.5 m ridge-height structure, including supplier interfaces and acceptance evidence that are commonly absent from fabric-only offers.